Enable the tools that help.
Close the ones that don't.
Blanket bans push AI into the shadows. Anzenna lets you decide who can reach which AI tools and accounts by role and risk, and revoke unsanctioned access in one click.
Block AI entirely and people route around you with personal accounts. Allow it everywhere and sensitive data flows into tools you never reviewed. Neither extreme is governance.
Static lists go stale instantly. A new AI assistant ships every week, each with its own OAuth scopes and data access. An allow/block list maintained by hand cannot keep up, and it has no idea who is actually using what.
Access control only works when it is grounded in identity and behavior: which person, which role, which data, which tool, right now.
A new AI assistant ships every week, each with its own OAuth scopes and data reach. Anzenna grounds every access decision in who the person is, what they normally do, and what the tool can actually touch, so the policy stays accurate as the AI stack changes underneath it.
Access is not a yes or no. It depends on the person, the tool, and the data.
A sanctioned copilot used by the team it was approved for, on non-sensitive work.
A powerful tool requested for work that touches regulated or crown-jewel data.
An unsanctioned account or an OAuth grant scoped far beyond the task.
Risky access surfaces as a reasoned case with the grant, the scope, and the fix.
Anzenna grounds every access decision in who the person is, what they normally do, and what the tool can reach.
Connect identity providers and SaaS agentlessly to see every account, OAuth grant, and AI tool already in reach of each person.
Define which roles can use which AI tools and accounts, with the data sensitivity each tool is allowed to touch.
When access breaks policy or behavior breaks baseline, Anzenna flags it with full context instead of a raw alert.
Cut unsanctioned access or an over-scoped grant directly, with a transparent audit trail for compliance.
Static allow/block lists treat every user and every tool the same. Anzenna reasons over identity, role, and behavior so access decisions stay accurate as your AI stack changes.
| Capability | Anzenna | Static allow/block lists |
|---|---|---|
| Access decisions by role & risk | ✓ | ✗ |
| Aware of who is actually using a tool | ✓ | ✗ |
| Keeps up with new AI tools | Continuous discovery | Manual updates, always behind |
| One-click revoke with audit trail | ✓ | Manual, per tool |
| Detects over-scoped OAuth grants | ✓ | ✗ |
| Enforcement | Agentless, across 130+ sources | Per-app, fragmented |
It can, but the point is precision. You set which roles can use which tools at which data sensitivity, so you enable the AI that helps and close only what is genuinely risky, instead of a blanket ban people route around.
Anzenna inventories every OAuth grant, scores its scopes and the data it can reach, and lets you revoke over-permissioned or unsanctioned grants in one click with a full audit trail.
Yes. Access control runs over read-only and revoke-capable API access to your identity providers and SaaS apps. There is no device agent to deploy.
Your identity provider governs sanctioned, configured apps. Anzenna adds the AI tools and accounts your IdP never saw, and grounds decisions in behavior, not just static group membership.
Thirty minutes. Your environment. No agents to deploy.